MERIT-HF
Is conventional therapy plus metoprolol CR/XR once daily superior to conventional therapy alone in patients with HF, a LV ejection fraction < 40%, and NYHA class II-IV symptoms?
Study design
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f478/7f4782016b79ea56b8572735009ed81f8f608e91" alt=""
Population
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e07b/0e07b9459187eebb70c53125370737e7edb7ff5a" alt=""
- 3991 patients (898 female, 1693 male)
- Inclusion criteria: patients with HF, an LV ejection fraction s 40%, and NYHA class II-IV symptoms
- Key exclusion criteria: acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 28 days before randomization; indication or contraindication for treatment with beta blockers, HF secondary to systemic disease or alcohol abuse; or AV block of the second and third degree
Interventions
- N=1990 conventional therapy plus metoprolol CR/XR once daily (12.5 mg for NYHA III-IV or 25.0 mg once daily for NYHA lI, target dose 200 mg once daily plus optimum standard therapy)
- N=2001 placebo (conventional therapy alone)
Primary outcome
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f0f/c1f0f858b2771249f727296e4ad22f34a7a16245" alt=""
Significant decrease in all-cause death (7.2% VS. 11%; RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.81)
Secondary outcomes
- Significant decrease in SCD (0.19% vs. 0.132%; RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.9)
- Significant decrease in worsening HF (0.3% vs. 0.58%;
RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.79)
Conclusion
In patients with HF, an LV ejection fraction s 40%, and NYHA class II-IV symptoms, conventional therapy plus metoprolol CR/XR once daily was superior to placebo with respect to a all-cause death.