Canalith Repositioning vs. Vestibular Suppressants in BPPV

Efficacy and safety of vestibular suppressants in patients with BPPV compared to placebo, no treatment, or canalith repositioning maneuvers (CRMs).

Study design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Population

  • Number of patients studied: 296
  • Inclusion criteria: RCTs comparing antihistamines, phenothiazines, anticholinergics, and/or benzodiazepines to placebo, no treatment, or a CRM in patients with BPPV
  • Exclusion criteria: Non-randomized studies, studies without a control group, and studies without relevant outcomes

Interventions

  • Experimental group: Vestibular suppressants (antihistamines, phenothiazines, anticholinergics, and/or benzodiazepines)
  • Control group: Placebo, no treatment, or CRM

Primary outcome: Symptom resolution at the point of longest follow-up (14-31 days)

Secondary outcomes

  • Symptom resolution within 24 hours: MD 5 points (95% CI -16.92 to 26.94)
  • Repeat emergency department (ED)/clinic visits: RR 0.37 (95% CI 0.12 to 1.15)
  • Patient satisfaction: MD 0 points (95% CI -1.02 to 1.02)
  • Quality of life: MD -1.2 points (95% CI -2.96 to 0.56)

Conclusion

In patients with BPPV, vestibular suppressants may have no effect on symptom resolution at the point of longest follow-up, while CRMs may be superior. Vestibular suppressants have uncertain effects on symptom resolution within 24 hours, repeat ED/clinic visits, patient satisfaction.